CSS/A / PROCESS / JUDGING

A clear system for
considered decisions.

Every eligible website is reviewed across the same five signals. The process rewards complete digital experiences, not a single impressive screen.

Meet the judging panel
SCORING MODEL / 100%

Five signals of quality

Each judge submits a score from 1 to 10 per criterion. Weighting keeps the final result balanced and transparent.

25%

Design

Visual hierarchy, typography, composition, consistency, and art direction across screen sizes.

20%

Usability

Clear navigation, accessibility, responsive behaviour, feedback, and ease of completing key tasks.

20%

Creativity

Original thinking, meaningful interaction, and ideas that serve the website rather than distract from it.

15%

Content

Relevant writing, media, structure, and a clear relationship between the message and its presentation.

20%

Development

Performance, technical execution, progressive enhancement, semantic structure, and production polish.

REVIEW PIPELINE

From submission to winner

A published profile records recognition permanently and credits both the website and its submitting studio.

01

Eligibility check

We verify that the public URL works, the submission is complete, and the website meets the published rules.

02

Panel review

Independent judges score the website from 1 to 10 against each of the five criteria.

03

Nominee status

Work meeting the quality threshold receives a permanent nominee profile and can progress to winner selection.

04

Winner selection

Judge scores form the primary result. Verified community voting provides a secondary signal when entries are closely matched.

05

Monthly and yearly review

Daily winners become eligible for Website of the Month. Monthly winners become eligible for Website of the Year.

INTEGRITY.JSON

Independent by design.

Judges do not review work where a direct conflict exists. Scores are recorded individually, abnormal voting patterns can be excluded, and paid submission never guarantees nomination or an award.

  • Conflict declarations
  • Individual judge scoring
  • Verified community signals
  • Permanent award records
READY FOR REVIEW?

Put your work before the panel.

Submit a website Read submission rules